You are currently viewing a placeholder content from Vimeo. To access the actual content, click the button below. Please note that doing so will share data with third-party providers.
More InformationYou are currently viewing a placeholder content from YouTube. To access the actual content, click the button below. Please note that doing so will share data with third-party providers.
More InformationYou need to load content from reCAPTCHA to submit the form. Please note that doing so will share data with third-party providers.
More Information
How to stop suffering.
Anxiety, loneliness, dissatisfaction, resentment, and psychological distress seem to be everywhere. Which raises an uncomfortable question: if we have become so sophisticated in understanding the world, why do we remain so confused about ourselves?
The dominant assumption is that suffering is primarily caused by external circumstances. Improve the circumstances and suffering should diminish.
I no longer believe that explanation goes deep enough.
More than 2,500 years ago, Buddhist psychology offered a different diagnosis. It suggested that much of human suffering is sustained by three forces: ignorance, attachment, and aversion.
IGNORANCE is not stupidity. It is our inability to see clearly. We become so identified with our beliefs, fears, ambitions, identities, and stories that we stop seeing them as interpretations. We begin to relate not to reality itself, but to the version of reality created by our minds.
From that misunderstanding arises ATTACHMENT. Not simply desire, but the attempt to hold on to what cannot be held. Relationships, success, status, health, youth, certainty, even our image of who we think we are. We expect permanence from a reality whose defining characteristic is change.
And when reality inevitably refuses to cooperate, AVERSION appears. We resist uncertainty, loss, failure, disappointment, aging, criticism, and everything else that violates our preferences. Much of our suffering comes not from pain itself, but from demanding that reality be different from what it is.
The three poisons reinforce one another. The less clearly we see, the more tightly we cling. The more tightly we cling, the more strongly we resist whatever threatens what we are attached to.
What keeps drawing me back to this teaching is that it places the source of suffering in a place most of us rarely examine.
We spend enormous amounts of energy trying to change the contents of our lives while leaving largely untouched the habits of mind through which our lives are experienced.
The Three Poisons suggest that much of what we call suffering is not simply something that happens to us.
It is something we continuously generate.
We demand permanence from a world built on change, certainty from a fundamentally uncertain existence, and control over things that have never been ours to control. Then we look for the cause of our suffering in our job, our partner, our finances, our past, our government, our bad luck, or the particular circumstances of our lives.
But we keep carrying the same machinery from one chapter of life to the next and then act surprised when the same forms of suffering reappear.
That is the accusation hidden inside the Three Poisons.
Not that life makes us suffer.
But that we spend much of our lives recreating the conditions for suffering and calling the result reality.