A reflection on leadership as temporary stewardship rather than ownership, emphasizing impermanence, responsibility, and the impact leaders leave on people, culture, and organizations.

We Are Just Visitors. Leadership and Impermanence.

Most leaders I work with behave as if they will stay.

As if the role, the influence, the position somehow belongs to them.

And to be fair - the system reinforces exactly that: targets, ownership, accountability, control.

But there is a different perspective that has been quietly challenging me for years.

A short passage, originally from Aboriginal wisdom and later quoted by Elizabeth II:

๐˜ž๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ญ ๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ด ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ, ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜ฑ๐˜ญ๐˜ข๐˜ค๐˜ฆ.
๐˜ž๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ซ๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ต ๐˜ฑ๐˜ข๐˜ด๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜จ๐˜ฉ.
๐˜–๐˜ถ๐˜ณ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฐ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฃ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ, ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฏ, ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜จ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ธ, ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜ท๐˜ฆโ€ฆ
๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ธ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ต๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ.

If you really let this land, it shifts something fundamental.

Because it questions a deeply ingrained assumption behind much of leadership behavior - that we are here to build, secure, and defend something that is โ€œours.โ€

But what if it isnโ€™t?

What if leadership is not ownership, but stewardship?

Not โ€œmy team,โ€ but a system I am temporarily responsible for.
Not โ€œmy success,โ€ but an environment I help shape for a period of time.

That shift may sound subtle, but it changes how you show up. You listen differently, intervene more carefully, think longer-term. You become less attached to being right and more committed to what actually serves.

And one question starts to matter more than most metrics:

What becomes possible because I am here?

Do people grow, or do they shrink around me?
Does trust increase, or does politics intensify?
Do we create something meaningful, or just optimize for the next quarter?

Most leaders donโ€™t lack intelligence or drive. What many lack is awareness of their own impermanence - and that creates a familiar pattern: control instead of responsibility, ego instead of contribution, short-term wins instead of lasting impact.

The uncomfortable truth is simple: none of us will stay.

Not in our roles, not in our organizations, not even in this life.

And if that is true, leadership becomes more precise.

You are here for a limited time. So what do you actually stand for? What do you want people to experience because of you? What do you want to leave behind - in people, in culture, in decisions that outlast you?

And maybe the most underestimated line:

โ€ฆ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ.

In leadership, that doesnโ€™t mean being soft. It means something far more demanding: caring enough to be honest, taking responsibility for the whole, making decisions that are not only effective but grounded, and treating people not as resources but as human beings in development.

You donโ€™t have to become philosophical to apply this.

Just start with a simple shift: act like a visitor.

In your next decision, your next conversation, in how you use your authority. Not detached, but aware that your time - and your impact - is limited.

Because in the end, the question wonโ€™t be how much you controlled.

It will be much simpler:

What did your presence make possible?

Get in Touch

We look forward to hearing from you.

Prefer to contact us directly?