You are currently viewing a placeholder content from Vimeo. To access the actual content, click the button below. Please note that doing so will share data with third-party providers.
More InformationYou are currently viewing a placeholder content from YouTube. To access the actual content, click the button below. Please note that doing so will share data with third-party providers.
More InformationYou need to load content from reCAPTCHA to submit the form. Please note that doing so will share data with third-party providers.
More Information
Most leaders I work with behave as if they will stay.
As if the role, the influence, the position somehow belongs to them.
And to be fair - the system reinforces exactly that: targets, ownership, accountability, control.
But there is a different perspective that has been quietly challenging me for years.
A short passage, originally from Aboriginal wisdom and later quoted by Elizabeth II:
๐๐ฆ ๐ข๐ณ๐ฆ ๐ข๐ญ๐ญ ๐ท๐ช๐ด๐ช๐ต๐ฐ๐ณ๐ด ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ช๐ด ๐ต๐ช๐ฎ๐ฆ, ๐ต๐ฉ๐ช๐ด ๐ฑ๐ญ๐ข๐ค๐ฆ.
๐๐ฆ ๐ข๐ณ๐ฆ ๐ซ๐ถ๐ด๐ต ๐ฑ๐ข๐ด๐ด๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ณ๐ฐ๐ถ๐จ๐ฉ.
๐๐ถ๐ณ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ณ๐ฑ๐ฐ๐ด๐ฆ ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฆ ๐ช๐ด ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ฐ๐ฃ๐ด๐ฆ๐ณ๐ท๐ฆ, ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ญ๐ฆ๐ข๐ณ๐ฏ, ๐ต๐ฐ ๐จ๐ณ๐ฐ๐ธ, ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐ท๐ฆโฆ
๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ฏ ๐ธ๐ฆ ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ต๐ถ๐ณ๐ฏ ๐ฉ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ฆ.
If you really let this land, it shifts something fundamental.
Because it questions a deeply ingrained assumption behind much of leadership behavior - that we are here to build, secure, and defend something that is โours.โ
But what if it isnโt?
What if leadership is not ownership, but stewardship?
Not โmy team,โ but a system I am temporarily responsible for.
Not โmy success,โ but an environment I help shape for a period of time.
That shift may sound subtle, but it changes how you show up. You listen differently, intervene more carefully, think longer-term. You become less attached to being right and more committed to what actually serves.
And one question starts to matter more than most metrics:
What becomes possible because I am here?
Do people grow, or do they shrink around me?
Does trust increase, or does politics intensify?
Do we create something meaningful, or just optimize for the next quarter?
Most leaders donโt lack intelligence or drive. What many lack is awareness of their own impermanence - and that creates a familiar pattern: control instead of responsibility, ego instead of contribution, short-term wins instead of lasting impact.
The uncomfortable truth is simple: none of us will stay.
Not in our roles, not in our organizations, not even in this life.
And if that is true, leadership becomes more precise.
You are here for a limited time. So what do you actually stand for? What do you want people to experience because of you? What do you want to leave behind - in people, in culture, in decisions that outlast you?
And maybe the most underestimated line:
โฆ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐ท๐ฆ.
In leadership, that doesnโt mean being soft. It means something far more demanding: caring enough to be honest, taking responsibility for the whole, making decisions that are not only effective but grounded, and treating people not as resources but as human beings in development.
You donโt have to become philosophical to apply this.
Just start with a simple shift: act like a visitor.
In your next decision, your next conversation, in how you use your authority. Not detached, but aware that your time - and your impact - is limited.
Because in the end, the question wonโt be how much you controlled.
It will be much simpler:
What did your presence make possible?